spacerNP Action Logo


Background

Why Nonprofit Advocacy?

Advocacy Glossary

State Advocacy Guides

Blog


Building Advocacy Capacity

Practical Advice

Build Advocacy Capacity

Management

Technology

Development and Fundraising

Research


Lobbying

How To

General Lobbying Tips

Lobbying the Legislature

Legal Information

Lobbying Administrative Agencies


Media

Using the Media


Organizing and Outreach

Coalitions

Mobilize and Organize


Nonprofits Can Help America Vote!

Learn About the Help America Vote Act (HAVA)

How Nonprofits Can Help

Examples of Good Nonprofit Citizens

Increase Voter Participation

Legal Do's and Don'ts

Student Voting

Post-Election 2008


Showcase Groups

Nonprofit Showcases


About NPAction

NPAction Help

Subscribe to the NPAction Update

Contact NPAction



Printable Version
Email to a Friend

See the ACLU v. HHS settlement documents


HHS Guidance on Keeping Federal Funds Out of Religious Programs

Federal grantees are free to use their private funds for legislative lobbying. But how can a group make sure the grant activities and the lobbying are kept separate? There are no clear cut rules on how to do this. However, nonprofit grantees may find guidance in standards on keeping religious activity separate from grant activity issued by the Dept. of Health and Human Services (HHS) in 2005. The standards were part of a settlement in a lawsuit alleging unconstitutional use of federal funds for religious activities. See the details....

In May 2005, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a lawsuit against HHS, accusing the department of allowing Silver Ring Thing (SRT) to use federal funds for primarily religious purposes. The suit charged the nonprofit violated the First Amendment because its federally funded abstinence program was not adequately segregated from its religious program. Specifically, the ACLU said the group's high-tech, three-hour road show - paid for with federal funds - provided Bibles and silver rings with religious messages for teens to wear as a token of their pledge of chastity until marriage.

Three months after the suit was filed, HHS suspended funding for the program. In a Sept. 20, 2005 letter to SRT, HHS stated misgivings that "the federal project that is funded ... includes both secular and religious components that are not adequately separated." HHS asked SRT to submit a Corrective Action Plan in order to receive the remaining grant funds.

That letter included six steps SRT needed to take to separate government-funded activities from religious activities: